BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ted Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 6 Apr 1997 00:22:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Steven A. Creasy wrote:
 
> Do you agree or disagree with the following:
>
> Waxmoth larva generally eat organic matter like the cocoons left in the
> cells of brood comb.  If honey supers are separated from brood boxes by a
> queen excluder 100% of the time, and no brood is ever raised in them, the
> chance of getting waxmoth in them is nil since there is nothing in them
> of  value to eat.
 
Agree!  I have always had perfect waxmoth control without chemicals in
honey supers if they had never had brood in them.  That is why I
*always* use queen excluders between the brood chamber and honey
supers.  Of course, occasionally a poorly made excluder lets a queen
through, and then there are problems immediately (honey extracting
around brood patches) and in the long run (wax moths in stored supers).
 
Ted Fischer
Dexter, Michigan USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2