Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:48:13 EDT |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Barry,
I too have been using Duragilt with good success. Sometime I have had a
few problems, part my own fault (let it get too warm) and have handeled
it too rough. I would say that my problems have been few and far between.
Look man! Any time that we mix it up with nature we will have a few
problems.
Bob Neely
[log in to unmask]
Goose Creek, SC
On Mon, 14 Apr 1997 15:07:02 -0500 Barry Birkey <[log in to unmask]>
writes:
>Okay, I just have to stick my nose in now. It sure sounds like
>Duragilt is coming out on
>the junk pile from most everything that's being said in this thread.
>Is it just me or
>what? I've never used anything but Duragilt and can't say I share the
>problems that
>others are talking about! Sure, once in a great while you will get a
>piece of foundation
>that starts getting messed up from the beginning but that's due to a
>flow that's
>inadequate for supporting comb building in my experience. Once the
>foundation has
>been pulled out I've never had "bald" spots appear in the comb. Are
>all those who have
>had "bad" experiences with Duragilt telling us the "whole" story? Is
>it that the
>foundation is inferior or is it not being introduced properly? Is it a
>"bald" spot here and
>there or is it frame after frame of comb being cleared down to the
>plastic? Anyone else
>willing to stick their head out and admit to using Duragilt? :>)
>
>Happy with Duragilt in Illinois!
>
>-Barry
>
>--
>Barry Birkey
>West Chicago, Illinois USA
>[log in to unmask]
>http://www.birkey.com
>
|
|
|