BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Roy Nettlebeck <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 May 1997 10:12:30 -0700
In-Reply-To:
<l03020901afa60e8742da@[205.138.55.60]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (20 lines)
On Mon, 19 May 1997, Greg Hankins wrote:
 
> >2. 70.8% of beeswax samples from outside of Germany contain detectible
> >levels of fluvalinate (compared to 13.2 % of German samples).
>
> Hate to ask a dumb question, but why the difference? Do German beekeepers
> not use Apistan?
>
> (BTW, I read someplace that the German for "beekeeper" is "bienenvater" --
> "bee-father!" I really like that.)
>
 Hi Greg and All,
 
  Do we still have someone on the list in Germany that can explain why
they have less residue. It is a good question Greg. I like the bee-father
also. I may use Bienenvater when I sell honey at the farmers markets.
 
 Best regards
 Roy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2