Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 1 May 1997 09:56:14 -0700 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It often puzzles (or embarasses) beekeepers that their bees seem to
prefer tainted water supplies (neighbour's chlorinated hot tub, seepage
from compost heaps, or worse) to the pure supply provided (sometimes
only after the habit of using the other source has been established).
I'm speculating, but maybe the pure supply is just harder for a
scent-oriented bee to locate ("inolfactible" (?) like invisible), and
those water foragers with a distinct scent would gain more recruits than
others with a scentless water supply. (even with, or in spite of,
recruiting dances, wouldn't you agree Adrian?)
If this is so, it suggests that scenting the (human) preferred source
might help redirect the water recruits away from the nuisance site. It
won't happen quickly if the nuisance source is a big and constant one
(like a swimming pool) but a smaller one (hot tub) could be made
unavailable (tarp) for a couple of hot days, and the bees might
re-orient to the new, distinctly-scented source.
I'd expect a few drops of fragrant flavouring (anise, lemon, vanilla)
would do the trick for 40 liters or 10 gallons of otherwise clean water.
It should work even better if the scenting is done before the bees
become oriented to the "problem" source.
Water dispensed by the droplet down a sloping board, into a tray of pea
gravel (nice dry platform for a bee) has been very attractive to bees.
I'd like to hear if it works or not.
Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
B.C. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
1201 103 Ave
Dawson Creek B.C.
V1G 4J2 CANADA Tel (250) 784-2231 fax (250) 784-2299
INTERNET [log in to unmask]
|
|
|