Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 1 Jul 1998 11:12:19 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Your question may have been satisfied by some of the responses you have
received, but it is not true to say that Polaris occupies the same position
with respect to the celestial north pole that it has for millenia.
Equinoctial precession keeps this relationship in flux. Just 300-400
years ago, for instance, Polaris was more distant from the celestial north
pole than at present which created immense problems for navigators. Around
1560, for instance, the CNP was about 3-plus degrees from Polaris. Now, it
is under a degree, I believe. So, in 1864, Polaris was measurably more
distant from the CNP than today. Also, since you're NPS.GOV, you could
also send your query to the US Naval Observatory in Wash, DC--they're on
the net. Robert Hicks
----------
> From: Cathy Spude <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Polaris declination
> Date: Monday, June 29, 1998 4:44 PM
>
> Is there anyone out there who can tell me how I might calculate the
> declination of Polaris from true north in Colorado in 1864?
>
> Cathy Spude
> [log in to unmask]
|
|
|