HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Mar 1997 13:09:24 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Amen, Mary Ellin.
 
Dan M.
 
>
> The ol' science vs. humanism thing....  Many of us (both prehistorians and
> historians) have come to the unsurprising conclusion that there is room for
> both approaches and many of us like to combine the two!  By this, I mean
> rigorous data collection and analysis combined with self-reflective,
> post-modernist, humanistic, historical, (fill in other adjectives here)
> approaches.  I for one am tired of the whole science vs humanities debate
> and wish we would recognize that archaeology, anthropology, and historical
> archaeology are social sciences and have room for a diversity of approaches
> and (I hope) dialog between them.
>
> Mary Ellin D'Agostino
> [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2