HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"(Mike Polk)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Mar 1997 15:51:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 97-03-11 14:59:35 EST, [log in to unmask] (MR ARTHUR A
REITER) writes:
 
<< Question; what would you do if you came across an unmarked
 footstone, that was flush with ground level,  which had no
 corresponding headstone? >>
 
Be sure what you are calling the "footstone" is not, in actuality, the
headstone.  There are often cases where the deceased or relatives did not
have enough money to purchase a large stone and so, what is normally a
footstone for many graves, becomes the main and only stone for a grave.  This
could explain why writing on a "footstone" faces inward toward the grave.
 Also, there have been cases we have seen where a grave is marked by nothing
more than a stone with a number which one has to match to a name on a list
somewhere.
 
Mike Polk
Sagebrush Consultants, L.L.C.
Ogden, Utah

ATOM RSS1 RSS2