Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - HISTARCH Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
HISTARCH Home HISTARCH Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Bottle typology
From:
MILLS ROBIN O <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Sep 1995 15:47:07 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Background: interior Alaska, late 19th-early 20th century mining
townsites, excavated during the past couple of years.
Now, I know I'm probably opening up a large Pandora's box here, but is
there an "acknowledged" typology for mid-to-late 19th and early 20th
century bottles out there (e.g., similar to Wilson's "A Classification
System for 19th Century Bottles; Switzur's "The Bertrand Bottles")?  Now,
I could extrapolate easily enough from either Wilson's or Switzur's
examples above, but I'm wondering if a perfectly good typology ALREADY
exists that I could tap into, and thus not reinvent the wheel for the
N-th time.
(Oh yes, how about a tin can typology for the same time period? Again, I
have all the terminology for manufacture down for tin cans, and in fact
have already catalogued them all. however, I'd like to place them in a
typology, and thus organize them and be able to refer to them efficiently).
Thank you for your consideration.
Robin Mills ([log in to unmask])

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV