Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 1997 13:12:37 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Organization: |
beeworks |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 10 Jan 97 at 18:42, Ian Watson wrote: Re: Varroa and Chalkbrood
> > 2 Why do we requeen, when it has been proved that it is not genetic.
> > Comments?
>
> Yes...
>
> How do you mean, "that it is not genetic"...?
There seems to be a variety of views regarding chalkbrood. "it's a spore,
it's caused by dampness, it's caused by chilled brood" neither of the
above is caused by the Queen! I know the accepted procedure is to requeen.
My point, if we have a good strong laying queen, why bother to change her,
when it's not her fault.
I tend to question some of our accepted methods, some just don't make
sense to me and this is one of them!
Any one want to comment?
*********************************************************
The Bee Works, 9 Progress Drive Unit 2, Orillia,
Ontario, Canada. L3V 6H1
David Eyre, Owner. Phone/Fax 705 326 7171
Agents for E.H.Thorne & B.J.Sherriff UK
http://www.muskoka.net/~beeworks
*********************************************************
|
|
|