Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:28:06 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
<v02130500af2b5a40f465@[132.236.155.181]> |
Organization: |
The Beeworks |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 15 Feb 97 at 12:21, Joel W. Govostes wrote: Re: frame spacing
> As noted in my previous message, the manner of spacing 9 frames in a brood
> box is different. They are nearly as close together as if you had all 10
> frames, and space is left over at the sides.
The first thing my bees would do under these circumstances would be to
fill it with brace comb.
I agree with Ian Watson! Why reduce the brood space by 10%, we need more
space not less. Up here our queens will have brood in all 16 frames of a
double brood 20 frame hive( the other 4 will have stores). Then she has
been seen laying in the first super above without a queen excluder!
Bees are like fish, 'they grow to the size of the pond' Keep fish in a
small pond, they stay small, keep bees in small hive they stay small.
The only reason for a 9 frame instead 10 is to make it easier for the
keeper. I agree you need one frame less if you're a big operator. But even
here I question the economics. More bees, more honey pure and simple.
*********************************************************
The Bee Works, 9 Progress Drive Unit 2, Orillia,
Ontario, Canada. L3V 6H1
David Eyre, Owner. Phone/Fax 705 326 7171
Dealers for E.H.Thorne & B.J.Sherriff UK
http://www.muskoka.net/~beeworks
*********************************************************
|
|
|