BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gordon Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 May 1996 17:02:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Mon, 20 May 1996, Allen Dick wrote:
 
> > >When harvesting honey, what percentage of uncapped cells can be
> > >tolerated without spoilage of the honey?  Do the frames need to be
> > >almost totally capped?
 
> Unfortunately, there is absolutely no direct  relationship  -- in
> spite of popular belief to the contrary -- between percentage of
> capped cells, and moisture content.
 
> There *is* a relationship, but it is not direct or consistent.
 
Checking the moisture content can be tricky for us small-scale
beekeepers who can't or won't afford a honey refractometer, which
is the "Right tool for the job". Sometimes, local beekeepeing
associations have them to borrow or hire.
 
I've sometimes wondered whether one can reliably/accurately
check the moisture content by measuring the specific gravity --
something that can be done with simpler & cheaper tools that
a refractometer. Anyone know?
 
Regards,
--
Gordon Scott   [log in to unmask]      [log in to unmask] (work)
The Basingstoke Beekeeper (newsletter)      [log in to unmask]
<A HREF="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/apis">Embryo Home Page</A>
Beekeeper; Kendo 3rd Dan; Sometime sailor.  Hampshire, England.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2