BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gordon Scott <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Jul 1996 20:01:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
>    My suggestion would be that everyone who got spammed should send back
> the original message with a simple "No thank you" at the bottom. If
> enough people do this it will burn up some bandwidth but they might get
> the message.
 
Unfortunately the address is usually bogus and this just burns
bandwidth without actually achieving anything. Most of these
spammers get their service terminated by their ISP, but often
they just start up again somewhere else. There's a newsgroup
news.net-abuse.misc (I think) where they report this stuff.
 
Rgeards, Gordon,
 
Gordon Scott   [log in to unmask]      [log in to unmask] (work)
The Basingstoke Beekeeper (newsletter)      [log in to unmask]
<A HREF="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/apis">Embryo Home Page</A>
Beekeeper; Kendo 3rd Dan; Sometime sailor.  Hampshire, England.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2