At 11:41  4/17/96 +1200, you wrote:
>---------------------- Information from the mail header -----------------------
>Sender:       Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
>Poster:       Robert Rice <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject:      Re: bee treatments -Reply -Reply
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>John,
>
>I'm sorry if you see the provision of factual information as "DRIVEL".  If
>you consult previous e-mails on this topic you will see that I have only
>made 2 responses to Walters comments which I too see as "TEASING".  I
>also agree that to much of this type of e-mail detracts from the function
>of the list.  However, if the list is to be a public forum for the expression
>of ideas and the exchange of information, then by definition an individual
>has the right to express an opinion.  Besides, one also, as I do daily,
>have the right to delete unread e-mail from BEE-L  if the contents of the
>E-mail is not of interest.  Therefore I suggest and do as I do, delete e-mail
>that is not of interest.
 
What a crock!  Give us a break!  I read this kind of response every time
people get on their high horses and don't want to come down.  You guys grow
up and quit wasting people's time and money.
 
 
>
>One additional comment.  Often e-mail can be like junk mail in your letter
>box, unsolicited but sometimes interesting to read.  Besides for a lot of
>people it makes the list a little more interesting to have the odd difference
>of the opinion expressed.
 
It's only interesting when their's actual value to it.  So far this has been
valueless arguing about who's the best (like arguing who has the tougher
dad).  Who cares!
 
>
>Robert Rice
>Apicultural Service Manager (South Island)
>Ministry of Agriculture
>New Zealand.
>
Mike Wallace
[log in to unmask]
McKinney, Texas   USA
Don't cuss!  Call Gus.  He'll cuss for both of us.