HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary Ellin D'Agostino <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Nov 1995 10:06:58 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Fixed and unfixed guns in probate inventories (the sources I am dealing
with) do not refer to major pieces of ordiance since A) they appear in
the inventories of individuals and B) they are of relatively low
value--their vaules are comprable to birding pieces and other personal
firearms.
 
Mary Ellin D'Agostino
[log in to unmask]
 
On Sat, 4 Nov 1995, Reynolds wrote:
 
> I may have this wrong, but since in the 17th century 'gun' retains
> its primary meaning (=cannon), and has aquired a secondary meaning
> (=moveable firearm except a pistol), I always have thought that 'fix'
> means 'fixed down, permanent', and 'unfixed' being portable.  I just
> checked in the OED - and it doesn't have 'unfixed' as being portable
> (it does have the other meanings), so I probably have got this wrong.
>
> In message  <[log in to unmask]> H
IS
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> > As long as we are on the subject of guns...
> > Does anyone know, exactly, what a 'fixed' vs 'unfixed' gun means in the
> > 17th century?  It does not mean 'broken' (many readers of probate data
> > make this assumption).  All the Oxford English Dictionary indicates for
> > this usage is "Prepared, put in order."
> >
> > Mary Ellin D'Agostino
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
>
> --
> Pat Reynolds
> Keeper of Social History, Buckinghamshire County Museum / Freelance Curator
>
> 16 Gibsons Green
> Heelands
> MILTON KEYNES
> England MK13 7NH
>
> [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2