HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Oct 1995 06:19:53 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
Just a clarification. There are (I was going to add 'of
course') physical anthropologists and archaeologists at
the site and they have their ideas.
 
My sketching colleague (who is also an archaeologist)
wants to look more widely at what the archaeological
community regards as good practice. Any suggestions?
 
Richard Wright
72 Campbell St
Balmain
NSW 2041
Australia
 
 
On Mon, 9 Oct 1995, James Duncan wrote:
 
> Please, get a Physical Anthropologist/Archaeologist to help
> you with this if at all possible.  If you have time to get a
> book and study it for the basics you have time to find a
> Physical specialist to help you.
>
> Does anyone have a list address for physical that can be
> sent to the list to help as a more direct source.
>
> On Mon, 9 Oct 1995, Richard Wright wrote:
>
> > This message passes on a request from a colleague who
> > has been asked to sketch human juvenile skeletons that
> > are being exhumed at a historic site. The question
> > relates to the sketches to be made after exposure and
> > before removal.
> >
> > What is regarded as 'best practice' in sketches that
> > will supplement photographs? References to good
> > published examples would be particularly welcome.
> >
> > Richard Wright
> > 72 Campbell St
> > Balmain
> > NSW 2041
> > Australia
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2