Anita Cohen-Williams; Reference Services; Hayden Library
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ  85287-1006
PHONE: (602) 965-4579              FAX: (602) 965-9169
INTERNET: [log in to unmask] Owner: HISTARCH
*** Forwarding note from MUSEUM-L--UNMVMA   11/01/94 10:58 ***
Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@ASUACAD) by
          ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5860; Tue,
          1 Nov 1994 10:58:54 -0700
Date:         Tue, 1 Nov 1994 17:11:51 GMT
Reply-To:     Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was [log in to unmask]
From:         Peter Honig <[log in to unmask]>
Organization: Aries Technology
Subject:      Late 17th century cistern
To:           Multiple recipients of list MUSEUM-L <[log in to unmask]>
 
I have recently discovered a cistern behind my house.
Evidence indicates that it was probably constucted at
the same time as the dwelling - 1672. Having picked
1759 as the site interpretation date, what would an
appropriate structure look like at the cistern mouth?
It is presently level with the ground and capped with
a 3'x3' stone. The inner walls are granite fieldstone
with three courses of 17th century bricks just below
the gound level. The bricks are mortared with clay.
 
If the cistern is reopened, should it be examined for
artifacts and plant remnants, or left alone for future
archaeologists? My field of knowledge is in 17th and
18th century carpentry, and although I have received
training in archeology I could not do as propper an
analysis as a professional. All suggestions are welcome.
 
Thanks in advance,
Peter Honig
[log in to unmask]