I was not the one that said that historians were just "telling stories". I
was in fact criticizing that postion which takes the very important
cautionary contributions of postmodern thought into absurd nihilistic
lengths. The recognition that science contains a subjective element does not
mean that it doesn't have an objective element. I never said that artists
were mere story tellers, or meant to imply there was no art in science, or
truth in art. I also neve meant to imply the science was the only means of
knowledge or truth.