HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Lewis, Lynne G." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:23:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
-- [ From: Lewis, Lynne G. * EMC.Ver #2.5.02 ] --
 
 
-------- REPLY, Original message follows --------
 
Date: Friday, 08-Nov-96 06:35 AM
 
From: Ned Heite                \ Internet:    ([log in to unmask])
To:   HistoricList             \ Internet:    ([log in to unmask])
 
Subject: omnisicent software
 
The query from Lynne Lewis about software was frightening indeed. There is
no such thing as a software package that will satisfy everyone's needs at
the user level. We should have learned that.
-------- REPLY, End of original message --------
 
First, thanks to S. Snow for her thoughts/info.  Second - I am not looking
for "omniscient" software.  The software (of whatever stripe) is being
purchased whether we like it or not, and we'll be expected to use it.  In
all likelihood this means that we'll be running dual data management
programs - one we already use and one that the org. wants us to use.  I was
just hoping for some feedback on what to expect/how bad is this going to be!
 On the bright side - at least the collections people have acknowledged that
the archaeology collections are a legit. part of the total collection.  In
previous incarnations, the collections mgr. has acquired software that
precluded use by archaeologists.
 
Lynne G. Lewis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2