HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Staeck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Oct 1996 09:53:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
We use Microsoft's Access and thus far have been pleased with the results.
I've been told by at least one Paradox user, though, that they find the
newer versions of Paradox more open-ended in terms of the program's
structure and the types of analyses they can conduct.  I can't say one way
or the other on this.  So far Access has done what we have asked it to do,
though by strong analytical standards we have not pushed it too hard.
 
Hope this helps.
 
regards - john
John Staeck         "MMMMMmmm, now that makes me very angry!"
Anthropology              Marvin T. Martian
Luther College
Decorah, IA 52101
319-387-1284
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2