Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Nov 1994 17:35:32 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
[A [A [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [
C [C [C [C [C [C [C [C [SOPA, Economics, and Barrooms [B [D [D [D [D [D [D [D [D
[D [D
Jed Levin raises some interesting points in his recent posting. An extension of
these is that we should not expect any organization to serve as an archaeologic
al police force, especially when maybe too many of us are unwilling to do this s
ort of job ourselves.
ts are too often underbid (at least many that I've seen), and how states (regard
less of the efforts of SHPO's and State Archaeologists) set priorities for archa
eology in comparison to other regulatory agencies/devices/needs.
Lastly, I recognize this problem is not limited to CRM alone and this is not m
eant as an assault on CRM, but CRM is responsible for a large part of the archae
ology being undertaken in North America and it seems a reasonable place to start
.
Hoping to have raked some muck - John Staeck, Luther College, Decorah, IA, 52101
319-387-1284 [log in to unmask]
|
|
|