Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 16 Jan 1996 09:47:15 AST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
First of all I must apologize for failing to identify myself in my
comment/question on density of beekeepers in U.S. I admit it was me.
Since I have not seen any comments from other Alaskan beekeepers some
of you might have guessed. I am working on getting some others in the
Cook Inlet Beekeepers Association signed up. This is a great source
of information. Much I cannot use, but what I can is worth it.
This particular communication is in reference to Michael Hardy's
article on "Where have all the bees gone?" It seems an overly
pesimistic outlook.
The mite problem is an example of something we have seen many times
throughout recorded history. A disease which is new to a particular
population is introduced with calamitous results. The natives of the
Americas were decimated by diseases which were mostly a nuisance to
the people who introduced them (speaking in broad terms). Whole
population groups were destroyed. But not all native Americans were
killed. Today they thrive at the same level as the descendants of the
European immigrants.
I am confidant that the same will happen with the mite devestations.
Oh, the colonies kept alive by treatment of one sort or another will
still be subject. The fact that most new feral colonies come from
swarms, most of which emerge from managed colonies, will slow down the
come-back, but I am confident that a come-back will occur before long.
By the way. Is there any real evidence that there is a "native" bee
population? I've heard some murmurings to that effect, but little
follow up.
Tom Elliott
Eagle River, Alaska 99577
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|