Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 11 Feb 1995 18:03:48 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom Wheaton's latest post is espousing George Miller's ideas regarding the use
of an EMIC typology, whereas others are arguing for an ETIC typology. I have
found that functional typologies (at least attempting to be EMIC ones) are best
for answering the humanistic questions, whereas the descriptive typologies
(etic) are best for scientific questions. It just depends on what we are asking
of our data. Neither approach is better or worse, as such. I am interested in
how people set their tables and what vessels were used for what purposes. But,
I am also interested in the nuances of dating a site and identifying where the
ceramics were made. To do this requires using both kinds of typologies and
doing two sets of analyses.
*********************************************
* William H. Adams, Ph.D. *
* P.O. Box 1177 *
* Philomath, OR 97370-1177 U.S.A. *
* (503) 929-3102 fax -3264 *
* [log in to unmask] *
*********************************************
|
|
|