HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dorothy Humpf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Apr 1995 08:40:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
<any>:[log in to unmask]
Re:Archaeology
I don't know whether historic archaeologists would consider the following
historic or prehistoric archaeology.  My dissertation focused on
sixteenth-century (contact period) Native American sites in Georgia.
Information on these groups is available in Spanish documents.  Is
this therefore, historic archaeology?
 
My point is that in some ways the terms historic and prehistoric
archaeology are just labels.  I agree with Karl Steinen and Irwin
Rovner that we are ALL archaeologists.  Some have the advantage of
using documents to help interpret the material culture record
Dorothy Humpf
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2