BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jean-Pierre Chapleau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Sep 1994 21:55:20 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I read with interest your report on queen losses from formic acid, Kerry.
 
Like inferior queens are not as well accepted as superior queens when introduced
into a colony, it makes sense that the bees ball them more readily if a big
disturbance happens to the colony.  How frequent would you estimate such queen
loss problems are when the treatment is aplied properly?  I am curious.
 
Concerning the building of emergency cells in presence of the queen, do you
consider this as an important and frequent problem?  I suppose it could be
attributed to a masking effect of the formic acid on the queen substance?.
Would the addition of a pheromone lure in the colony resolve the roblem?  Would
this situation occur only in presence of an inferior queen providing too little
queen substance to its colony?
 
 
Jean-Pierre Chapleau,
queen breeder
Quebec, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2