Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 17 Oct 1995 14:12:37 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As far as I know, unless you have a really high quality scanner, your
best bet is still to get a half-tone made of the original photo.
Mary Ellin D'Agostino
[log in to unmask]
On Tue, 17 Oct 1995, Larry Mckee wrote:
> I am seeking some advise on how best to reproduce photos for photocopied
> interim/summary reports. I've had some success with using color photocopies
> of black and white prints in a small number of "master" copies (since they
> cost about a buck a piece) and then using the color photocopy as the source
> for a regular photocopy in the rest of the 50 or so copies produced - this
> seems to work better than a straight xerox of the B&W's.
> I know there are some elaborate scanning systems that are starting to be
> more affordable but the operation here is a long way off from buying such
> hardware. Places like Kinko's and other self-serve copy centers are starting
> to have scanners available for customer use, but I'm pretty far behind in the
> vocabulary and the knowledge of where to start, and how far to go with it.
> Can anyone provide a quick tutorial on their successes with this or
> recommend a published source on the clearest and cheapest way to reproduce
> photos for photocopied reports?
> Thanks
> Larry McKee
>
|
|
|