Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 18 Oct 1995 16:49:51 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
=09
I was part of the 1991 Stonybrook University Terry-Mulford Field Project =
in Orient Point, Long Island, New York. We labeled thousands of =
artifacts using laser printed catalog numbers printed on acid-free paper =
and laquer. It was by far the most efficient labeling technique I have =
ever seen. For each artifact, we cut out a small square with a =
pre-printed catalog number on it, with an exacto-knife, placed it on =
the artifact, and then applied a coat of laquer over it.=20
As far as the stability of this technique is concerned, I have not heard =
anything. At the National Park Service, there are federally approved =
standards to follow for the handeling, labeling and curation of =
artifacts. As far as I know, the only approved method for artifact =
labeling is the old pen, ink and laquer (approved brands, of course). =
Perhaps someone should conduct a study for the stability of the =
pre-printed labels or paper and laquer methods. Does anyone know about =
any?
Margo Schwadron
NPS-Southeast Archeological Center
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|