HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"L. Daniel Mouer" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Feb 1995 18:01:45 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Tom writes:">Dan Mouer mentioned sherds 1 cm in diameter.  That seems
awfully large to be
>a gizzard stone.  How large are gizzard stones anyway?"
 
My statement was misleading. Actually the sherd is a thin square of
fine underglaze blue Chinese export, about 1760s, roughly 1 cm.
square and perhaps 10mm thick. I wouldn't want anyone to accuse me of
postmodern imprecision.
Dan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2