BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kerry Clark 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jan 1995 08:34:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
   The choice of a national AFB strategy is certainly an interesting
   debate, and may depend on "environmental" factors such as beekeeping
   practices and traditions as much as narrow biological considerations.
 
   I can add a note about one of Gordon's comments re irradiated AFB.
   I was looking at some Gamma irradiated AFB combs which had had a package
   installed earlier. The treatment worked: the colonies were healthy.
 
   However, there was still scale left in the cells (although the cleaner
   bees were getting around to chipping away at some of the scales, and
   the scales looked a little different, since the cleaners had started to
   polish them in to the rest of the cell wall). I brought a toothpick
   sample to the lab and made a standard water suspension.
 
   The spores appeared identical to those from viable AFB scales.
 
   Perhaps not surprising, since the "tumbling", Brownian motion results
   from the spores' size, not motility, but interesting.
 
 
   Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
   B.C. Ministry of Agriculture
   1201 103 Ave
   Dawson Creek B.C.
        V1G 4J2  CANADA          Tel (604) 784-2225     fax (604) 784-2299
   INTERNET [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2