Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Private vs Public Bitnet communication
From:
KIRK VISSCHER <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Aug 1991 06:56:00 PST
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
This is to call to the attention of readers of Bee-L the possibility of
and the desirability of sending Private E-mail, rather than posting
everything on the public line.  When Tom Sanford posts an issue APIS, or
Peter Kevan announces the availability of BumbleBeeQuest, it is not
necessary, nor is it especially polite, to send your response, which is
a private communication of no particular general interest, to Bee-L.
Instead, such things should be sent to the personal Bitnet address of the
person posting them, which is always included in the header of the
transmission.  I don't mean to inhibit exchanges of information and views
about topics posted to Bee-L: this is the stuff that makes it a vital
forum.  Rather, I mean the multiple messages of "yes, I'm interested,"
or "I got it" that just take up everyones time and disk space to skip over.
-yer friendly neighborhood crank, Kirk Visscher.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV