BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Dec 2023 01:18:36 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
"RQA Inc., under contract with a client in the honey industry,..."
We bee keepers routinely flat out reject any "scientific" study funded by any industry we do not like such as the pesticide industry.  So, I submit as a simple act of fairness that any "scientific" results funded by the bee industry are all lies by the same standard and should be flat out rejected.  Not only rejected but ridiculed.  To be consistent the only proper conclusion is the people that funded this study cheated and lied and used fake samples and have as their only real objective the wish to poison all of us.  After all, all those good smelling things in honey that make it so attractive are known poisons.

Just for the record I think the above is pure nonsense with the exception of the good smelling things being known poisons.  That part is a simple fact.  In fact, under US and European law if a company that holds a pesticide registration did rig a scientific study they risk being put out of business by the government unlike the honey industry which could rig a study on honey and suffer no severe legal consequences.

Dick

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2