BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:40:45 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
David Evans <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines)
I was surprised that there was disappointingly little information on the 'historically high losses' in the Oregon commercial operation. I would have thought that if these losses were due to queenlessness it would have been identified and would certainly warrant a comment in the paper. Were these losses summer losses - when virus levels are higher - or winter losses when the levels are much lower? Perhaps the title of the 'in prep' paper by Steinhauer (ref 10) "Apiary-level virus complexes rather than specific viruses are associated with increased colony mortality in underperforming beekeeping operations" is a clue that this new virus is not linked - at least not solely linked - to colony loss.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2