Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:34:30 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Abundant drone brood a the sign of vigor, not the other way around.
At least for the purposes of this study, I think the intent of this observation was not as a proxy for hive health per se but rather representative of nascent observations surrounding the role drone rearing (and possibly now the emerged drones themselves) might play in the worker infestation rate.
In the paragraph immediately preceding, the study authors observe:
Despite the current focus on what is happening in worker cells, studies focusing on the role of recapping in drone brood are still in their infancy with. Currently, data is only available from South Africa (Fig. 1) and now Cuba (this study). Interestingly, both studies indicate no significant difference in recapping rates between infested and non-infested brood. This is caused by some colonies performing no recapping of drone brood, while some colonies do recap cells but in a non-targeted manner. Whereas there is a significant increase in the size of the recapped area between infested (3.1 mm) and non-infested (2.3 mm) worker cells (Fig. 3), this does not occur in drone brood, as it appears that the holes are entirely exploratory. However, the lack of removal of infested drone brood may be playing an important role in mite-resistance (see below).
Since an empirical model indicated that negative mite population growth occurs in (resistant) Africanised honeybee colonies only when the initial drone cells are present. This is thought to arise because mites also show a tenfold preference to reproduce in drone cells (which comprises only 1–5% of all the honeybee brood) and they soon become overcrowded as the mite population increases. This leads to inter-mite competition for the limited food and space, causing an increase in mite mortality, resulting in negative reproductive success for mites entering these overcrowded drone cells. Thus, mite population growth in drone brood cells is limited by a density-dependent mechanism.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|