BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Randy Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Mar 2021 10:42:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
>

I know that you have chosen not to use II. Can you explain your reasoning?

I am performing my selective breeding program in full transparency as an
experiment to see whether Joe Queen producer could develop and/or maintain
mite-resistant stock without the need for brood dissection, II, tedious
bloodline tracking, etc.

My drones for each current year all come from the genetics of the queens
from which I grafted the previous year, so what would be the advantage of
II?
I've yet to identify a queen whose progeny all exhibit mite resistant
colonies, so there's no queen or drone yet to choose for II.
If I do identify such a queen, I will certainly make her drones available
for II.

It's so tantalizing to find colonies that are entirely mite-proof.  And so
frustrating that so far, they are not passing that trait onto their
daughters.

Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
530 277 4450
ScientificBeekeeping.com


>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2