BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:01:57 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
>  to control a massive EFB/AFB outbreak, we found that colonies turned out
onto bare equipment in a nectar flow  not only drew out comb like
lightning, they went into a brood rearing frenzy, raising far more brood
than they would have left on their original combs

I've observed the same.  A strong AFB colony shook onto foundation early in
a strong flow can surpass fully-established colonies in a couple of
months.  I was amazed and have no explanation.

I agree that radioactive tracers are not a good idea!

>What prevents the manufacturer from using beeswax for the formed comb
rather than developing synthetic wax?

Beeswax wasn't strong enough, and there were problems with it.  At that
point, I would have simply dropped the project...
Our industry is based upon the perception of naturalness and purity.
Manufacturers and beekeepers should keep that in mind.
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2