Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:03:30 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Varroa: Beauty of paper
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
This research using pin puncture tests on squares of 100 purple-eyed pupae conducted over three years during all seasons evaluated hygienic behavior, among other traits, in what they refer to as bees subjected to "strong breeding efforts".  The bees included different gene lines from many geographic locations. 


>  The GLM analysis showed that hygienic behaviour was not significantly affected by year or origin. The trait was instead highly significantly
(p < 0.01) affected by season, location and genotype (Table 2). The highest expression of the trait was estimated in July and August, while
the lowest was estimated in May and autumn (Table 7). 

Comment: The above results follow what has been reported in most of the research referenced below, that hygienic behavior increases as conditions change, especially around the honey flow. I'm getting that it's not a matter of whether a behavior changes, rather it's the colony level expression that varies as needed (Robinson,1992). In the case of increased honey flow, hygienic behavior is reported to increase accordingly.   

>Seasonal differences in expression of hygienic behaviour have been frequently reported (Panasiuk et al., 2009; Güler and Toy, 2013), but
there are also contradictory reports (Bigio et al., 2013). It is likely that season and location interact to yield unique combinations of floral
availability and nectar flow, which are known to influence the expression of hygienic behaviour (Momot and Rothenbuhler, 1971; Robinson, 1992;
Spivak and Gilliam, 1998a,b; Johnson, 2003). Furthermore, according to several authors, hygienic behaviour is mainly exhibited by workers
that are younger than three weeks (Thompson, 1964; Arathi et al., 2000; Panasiuk et al., 2010), and different balance of young and old bees in
the colony may affect expression the trait at the colony level. This may, for example, explain the lower cleaning rate we observed in autumn. 

>Swarming, defensive and hygienic behaviour in honey bee colonies of different genetic origin in a pan-European experiment
Aleksandar Uzunov et al. 

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3896/IBRA.1.53.2.06



Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV