BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sun, 7 Feb 2021 12:33:04 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
"Janet L.Wilson" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
The content of this thread reveals the desperation amongst beekeepers to find a suite of effective anti-Varroa tools. In my locale, there is a growing sense that beekeepers are overdependent on OA, and OAV in particular is not as effective as we'd like...or perhaps expect. We are hamstrung by a lack of understanding of exactly how OA targets the mites, a grasp of best delivery methods/schedules, and a paucity of control options. 

As a beekeeper I welcome the flow of research $$ into labs doing Varroa studies, and which are examining non-toxic Varroa control. Dr. Jack's study raises some interesting questions we'd all like to see answered.

On the topic of queen caging: here in northern, short-summer areas, particularly those with limited nectar flows, queen caging is not an option...or at least is not a good option. There are other ways to achieve the goal of queen caging (to render a colony broodless prior to treatment for Varroa) without sacrificing queen productivity.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2