BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gene Ash <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:41:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
a Beekeepers snip followed by > my comment.. 
Perhaps we should also consider worker longevity.

>There is an old queen rearer's rule that you can only get something (morphology or behavior trait) by giving something up.  I think it was Charlie Marzz who wrote an article in the ABJ (yes decades ago so do not ask me for the reference) about how you really did NOT want a queen with a extra ordinary egg laying capacity since these would also burn thru food resources quickly and invariable die by the middle of the winter (I should note here that in that era beekeepers did not feed like they do today). I would also guess these sorts of queens would burn themselves out fairly quickly. A dud is a dud so those disqualified themselves from what you wanted.  Consequently what any breeder or customer should desire is a queen who's egg laying capacity fall right in the middle of the distribution of queens egg laying capacity.

>I will add here that in some landscapes and or purposes for which people keep bees this basic idea has undoubtedly been abandoned.

>and as to your question... when raising queens for myself or to sale I certainly do!

Gene on the left coast for a short while...

 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2