BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Feb 2020 16:33:30 -0800
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000fa6f8e059e7e5c69"
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (888 bytes) , Hellmich 1990 Abstract.JPG (59 kB)
>
> There were two studies by USDA that tested matings in various apiaries.

Hellmich, R & G Weller (1990) Preparing for Africanized honey bees:
Evaluating control in mating apiaries.  ABJ 130(8): 537-542.
Hellmich, R, et al (1993) Evaluating mating control of honey bee queens in
an Africanized area of Guatemala.  ABJ March 207-211.
I've attached the abstract of the 1990 paper, which indicated that breeders
could expect 95% control in open matings.

Those of us who live near high mountains can move mating nucs to
high-elevation areas that don't have resident honey bee populations.  That
would ensure 100% control.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html


ATOM RSS1 RSS2