BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 09:59:15 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Royal Jelly
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
>
> >If Haydak et al. are correct, then it seems highly unlikely that royal
> jelly would change constituents based on the queen rearing situation.


If the nurses needed to adjust, then there would likely need to be cohorts
that specialized in feeding any queen cells present.  Has anyone seen a
study where they marked those nurses that fed queen cells?

And how about the question that I posed earlier this season--did any of you
find much pollen in 5th-instar larvae?


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2