BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:21:34 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>
>
> Randy did you just alter the rim diameter, or the whole cup and thus have
> different volumes as they did in the experiment?


How do you know what they did in the experiment?  As far as I can find,
their only description of the cells was this:
" After three days, the eggs hatched into larvae and were inserted into
queen cells with an inner diameter of 9.4 mm, 9.6 mm, 9.8 mm and 10.0 mm,
respectively."
I can't find anything about the shapes, volumes, or even whether they were
made of wax or plastic.

Just altering the rim diameter would have created a step.  So no, I ground
the end of a steel rod to a taper to match the bottom of the 8 mm cup.
So total volume was increased.  But that volume may be moot if there is
residual unconsumed jelly, as in the cells that I reared.
As you can see, the actual cells that the bees built were of roughly the
same size -- the cell cups mostly just held jelly, which did not appear to
be a limiting factor.
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2