BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Mon, 18 May 2020 19:55:17 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30015-4


"12 (71%) of the 17 locations showed significant increases in seasonal
cumulative pollen or annual pollen load. Similarly, 11 (65%) of the 17
locations showed a significant increase in pollen season duration over time,
increasing, on average, 0.9 days per year."

While this addresses windblown pollens that trigger allergies, a bloom is a
bloom is a bloom, so I expect that we can apply these findings to the
insect-pollinated trees.

And as a general rule of thumb, the higher one's (north OR south) latitude,
the larger the annual change.

Good news for allergists, and it seems that we can infer earlier and longer
blooms of plants of value to bees.

Bad news for the climate, though. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2