HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Richard Wright <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:40:41 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (345 lines)
 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Pye" 
To:, "Richard Wright" 
Cc:
Sent:Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:04:55 +0000 (UTC)
Subject:Re: Health and safety considerations for exhumations

 All,

 I have attached a copy of the Borstel and Niquette paper, which was
cited in a previous email. The blue-green crystals are mentioned in
this paper, but the only source provided is personal communication
attributed to Dana Kollman, a forensic anthropologist currently at
Towson University. I have sent an email to Dana to ask if she has
specific sources that discuss this phenomenon. I will report back if I
hear anything. 

 Other than the Meyers et al. 1998 paper, for which a link was given
previously, I do know of two other publications that discuss health
concerns in historic cemeteries, including arsenic. These include
Konefes and McGee (2001) and Bybee (2004), both of which are attached.
Bybee does show a picture of the blue-green crystals in a grave in
Kentucky, but the reference given for the blue-green crystals is
Borstel and Niquette. 

 Best,
 Jeremy 
 --------------------------------------------
 On Tue, 4/16/19, Richard Wright  wrote:

 Subject: Re: Health and safety considerations for exhumations
 To: [log in to unmask]
 Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019, 5:30 PM

 Daniel
 I agree
 absolutely that prior tests for arsenic should be carried
 out
 on cemetery soils. No question about
 that.
 What I was worried about was that
 excavators might get the jitters if
 what
 they were observing were merely bluish crystals of
 vivianite,
 which are commonly found around
 bodies in soils that contains iron. 
 An
 anecdote, unrelated to health and safety. In one forensic
 site,
 containing an unidentified murdered
 body, an excavator thought that
 the blue on
 a persons clothing showed that the person must have
 brushed up against crumbling, blue coloured
 distemper on a painted
 wall. Alas there was
 no such forensic clue. The blue was made up of a
 dusting of tiny crystals of vivianite.
 Richard

 -----
 Original Message -----
 From:
 "HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY" 
 To:
 Cc:
 Sent:Tue, 16 Apr 2019
 14:02:32 +0000
 Subject:Re: Health and safety
 considerations for exhumations

 Richard, 
 Well, the original
 citation was Borstel C.L. and Niquette C. Testing
 Procedure for Historic Cemeteries. Cultural
 Resource Analysts, inc.;
 Lexington, KY, USA:
 2000 - which used to be relatively easy to find
 online, but now all I can seem to locate are
 articles that use it as a
 reference. It was
 taken from a paper that originally appeared in the
 publication of ACRA (American Cultural
 Resources Association) in Issue
 6-5 from the
 year 2000, but that issue is not available in their
 archives, and that appears to have been taken
 from a paper presented
 at the Archaeological
 Society of Virginia's annual meeting on October
 3, 1998. The paper is available on Academia
 https://www.academia.edu/10146132/Arsenic_and_Old_Graves_Testing_Procedures_at_Nineteenth-Century_Cemeteries
 though it does not include a reference to
 arsenic presenting as blue
 green crystals in
 historic burials. 

 The
 notation of arsenic presenting as vivid blue or
 blue-green
 crystals does appear on page 40
 of this Chicora Foundation report on
 the
 excavation of a historic cemetery in South Carolina
 http://www.chicora.org/pdfs/RS73%20-%20Son%20Cemetery%20compressed.pdf
 but the reference in the report is to the ACRA
 paper, and no specific
 examples are
 illustrated in the report 

 We have no specific examples of arsenic
 presenting as blue-green
 crystals from the
 historic period excavations conducted to date in
 Kentucky, but we have not encountered high
 concentrations of arsenic
 in any of the
 completed exhumations. In short, the reference appears
 to come from a single source and currently
 appears to lack any field
 verification that
 I can locate. If however, arsenic were present in
 such concentrations in a historic period burial
 that it did appear as
 a cluster of vivid
 crystals, we would be looking at a burial that
 constituted a haz-mat site, which would create
 a very different set of
 problems. 

 I do not see a good means to
 differentiate vivianite from possible
 arsenic contamination in the field aside from
 testing the soils
 beforehand. I would guess
 that, if testing shows no contamination of
 soils by arsenic but blue-green crystals appear
 on skeletal remains,
 you may have vivianite.
 If you do have contamination of soils from
 arsenic and crystals appear, additional - and
 very careful - testing
 of the material
 should be undertaken to determine its composition. 

 Fun stuff.

 Dan

 -----Original Message-----

 From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
 On
 Behalf Of Richard Wright

 Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 5:33 PM
 To: [log in to unmask]
 Subject: Re: Health and safety considerations
 for exhumations

 Daniel
 I did not know that arsenic forms blue green
 crystals, but then I
 have never worked in
 that sort of cultural environment for burials.
 However, I have worked on numerous human and
 animal sites where the
 mineral
 'vivianite' (an iron phosphate) forms harmless
 bluish crystals
 on bones and clothing.
 https://www.academia.edu/6961746/The_significance_of_vivianite_in_archaeological_settings
 [1]
 Vivianite is odd. You can
 expose parts of a burial and notice nothing
 on the surface of the bones. After you return
 to work from a coffee
 break you see bones
 that are covered with bluish crystals. The
 explanation is that vivianite is colorless when
 buried, but oxidizes
 on exposure to light

 Is there any literature on
 the blue green crystals of arsenic?

 Richard

 ----- Original
 Message -----
 From: "HISTORICAL
 ARCHAEOLOGY" 
 To:

 Cc:
 Sent:Mon, 15 Apr 2019 12:35:11 +0000
 Subject:Re: Health and safety considerations
 for exhumations

 I
 recommend testing the soils around historic graves prior to
 any
 excavation to determine the presence of
 hazardous materials -
 especially lead,
 arsenic, creosote, and mercury. Take samples away
 from the interments to get an idea of
 background levels of these
 materials, and
 follow OSHA guidelines with respect to the levels of
 any of the materials that show up in your
 samples. 

 In most
 conditions - regular cemetery, wooden coffin, tropical to
 subtropical environment - the risk of
 infectious or contagious disease
 still being
 viable is pretty much non-existent. In some cases with
 good preservation, say above the Arctic Circle,
 the possibility of
 encountering viable
 contagions would increase significantly. Here in
 Kentucky, however, arsenic is the thing that I
 worry about most. It
 was used as an
 embalming agent for around 50 years, from around 1860
 to 1910, with up to 12 pounds of arsenic used
 per interment. It
 presents in burials as
 blue green crystals, but if you haven't
 prepared for it by the time you see it,
 you're hosed.

 Daniel
 B. Davis
 Administrative Branch Manager,
 Cultural Resources Section Kentucky
 Transportation Cabinet Division of
 Environmental Analysis
 200 Mero Street
 Frankfort, KY 40622
 (502)
 564-7250 or (502) 782-5013
 KYTC Archaeology
 and KYTC Cultural Historic

 -----Original Message-----
 From: HISTORICAL
 ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
 On
 Behalf Of Adrian Myers

 Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 7:28 PM
 To: [log in to unmask]
 Subject: Health and safety considerations for
 exhumations

 Hi all,

 Can anyone point me to any
 articles or research that explore the
 issues
 around possible health and safety risks associated with
 exhumation of historical graves, both in
 general (e.g.
 lead/chemical/hazmat
 exposure, depth of excavations), but also
 specifically in relation to the possibility
 that an interred
 individual died of a
 communicable disease (e.g. Spanish Influenza).
 i.e., are there risks of disease transmission
 from a historical
 burial, and is there any
 research to back this up?

 Since so far I have nothing on it, I will also accept your
 informed
 anecdotes and opinions!

 Thanks kindly

 *Adrian Myers, PhD*

 ############################

 To unsubscribe from the HISTARCH list:
 write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
 or click the following link:

 https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

 ############################

 To unsubscribe from the HISTARCH list:
 write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
 or click the following link:

 https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

 Links:

 ------
 [1]
 https://www.academia.edu/6961746/The_significance_of_vivianite_in_archaeological_settings

 ############################

 To unsubscribe from the HISTARCH list:
 write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
 or click the following link:

 https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

 ############################

 To unsubscribe from the HISTARCH list:
 write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
 or click the following link:

 https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

 ############################

 To unsubscribe from the
 HISTARCH list:
 write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
 or click the following link:
 https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1


########################################################################

Access the HISTARCH Home Page and Archives:
https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=HISTARCH

Unsubscribe from the HISTARCH List:
https://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?SUBED1=HISTARCH&A=1

########################################################################

ATOM RSS1 RSS2