> Dismissing someone's work, presented in a respected journal, without reading it, seems ill-advised at best.
>> Ill advised? What is ill-advised is wasting time digging up and reading studies that contradict what my , many many thousands of hive years of experience...
Far faster and easier to link the paper than argue.
Papers in JAR do tend to be legit, but I haven't read it yet, nor can I presume to argue about what I can't even read today. (It's spring - garden, bees, clean the saltwater chlorine generator for the pool, new MacPherson strut spring seats for DeVolvo...)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gkcrP0bOZEB3L2JufYzsFaCeDvNYxoJk/view?usp=sharinghttps://tinyurl.com/byskr3ny
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html