Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:39:54 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Dismissing someone's work, presented in a respected journal, without reading it, seems ill-advised at best.
Ill advised? What is ill-advised is wasting time digging up and reading studies that contradict what my , many many thousands of hive years of experience and my own experiments tell me and that is confirmed by many successful practical beekeepers.
As for respected journals, are there any respected journals any more? And if there are, are their articles beyond question? Several of the most prestigious have had to eat crow lately and those are the ones that have been outed.
What is well-advised is to state my opinion of the conclusions and expect the person posting the study, who I expect has read and understood it, to explain why I am wrong in my opinion, based on facts, not an opinion.
Was that study well-designed? Was it well executed? Were there conflicts of interest? Were there sufficient numbers of hives to be meaningful? Were confounding factors considered?
Prove that I am wrong.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|