>
> . If someone follows a practice pushed in the article and gets injured,
> then the disclaimer can afford some protection to the publication.
Under what legal theory? Do you have examples?
In reality the publication would never be held liable in the first place.
You can’t sue someone because you read something (other than IIED which
isn’t followed by most states). Thus the disclaimer can’t reduce the liable
exposure if it was never there.
>
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html