BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sun, 25 Nov 2018 19:25:41 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Chris >This is not the experience of prof. Haydak. See http://www.fiitea.org/foundation/files/1967/M.%20HAYDAC.pdf (Table 4).


My question about the Table 4 results is Hayak's use of what he referred to as "fresh-dried" pollen. If the goal of the comparisons was to simulate the nutritional value of natural pollen versus all the rest, drying the fresh pollen may have altered the constituents making the comparisons about dried and processed pollen patties and not a comparison to "a good mix of natural pollen" as Richard stated. 


Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2