BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jun 2018 09:56:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> PMS-like signs ... cleared up with oxytet (similar to the report from Dick).  That does not support the virus hypothesis.

One could deduce that the symptoms were caused by some organism that was susceptible to antibiotic treatment. One could also suggest that the antibiotic promoted a more vigorous immune response, enabling the larvae to survive despite whatever pathogens are present. 

Again, I don't think a response associated with an antibacterial is *proof* of a bacterial infection. You would have to isolate the putative organism and show that it was affected by oxytet, outside of the bee. 

That is how Beltsville tests for oxytet resistance: in AFB cultures, in vitro. Normal AFB won't grow in the presence of oxytetracyline. TM resistant AFB can, but it won't grow in the presence of Tylosin.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2