Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:11:36 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I would also suggest enslaving yourself strictly to the rules of logic
leads to a very boring style of prose that likely will never be read by
anyone than yourself and your university adviser.
I do not find that to be true. On the contrary, I find posts by some on
this List who do not prescribe to logical discourse to be very difficult to
follow--and thus I generally skip over them unless they cite my name.
For example, in this case. Gene here used a "straw man" fallacy that it
order to write logically, that one's writing would be so boring that it
would never be read other than by an academician.
In fact, I go out of my way to write logically, and my articles are read by
many. Thus, the evidence at hand does not support Gene's claim.
--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|