BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:53:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I would temper this with two observations:


1) Honey Bees are native to Europe - unless you want to consider them immigrants from African/Middle East,
2) Modern research concerning the interactions of honey bees and 'native bees' don't necessarily support the honey bees are bad, native bees are good.   Sometimes a bit of competition has unexpected benefits.
3) Pollination is pollination - the current plants don't really care whether the pollinator is native, non-native, managed, or unmanaged.   The next generation of plants will reflect the benefit of pollination.  
4) I well understand that some native pollinators and plants have very specialized relationships -  but those the require a very specific fit probably won't see much impact from honey bees.  However, the plant community in a wild setting needs pollinators to thrive.


My point, which is overly simplistic is actually a critique of cherry-picking literature to support a 'sky is falling' hypothesis.    Can there be adverse impacts from over-stocking - of course.  





             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2