BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Jan 2018 21:33:46 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
>>>  It's easy enough to make up long bibliography lists and store them in a file.  It's another to actually read the papers - and I  don't mean just reading the abstract.<><><>  Last time I read through the citations was when they were my own when composing a couple of masters theses (Theses is the plural form of thesis.  Thought I'd add this caveat since I had to look it up to bee correct.)  When we read papers written by others, do we take the time to read the citations listed to ensure that they are apropos to the paper written?   Would bee easy to write the paper and then list some citations that look good for the paper.   Usually I just read the paper and then go from there, not ensuring that the paper was developed from the citations listed.  Just sayin'.

Mike in LA

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2